Planning Applications
Planning applications for demolitions, rebuilding, extensions and other development work to Moor Park properties should be sent to Three Rivers District Council (TRDC) planning department to make their decision on each application, and also be sent to the Planning Team at Moor Park (1958) Limited. From 1st June 2019, a summary of each planning application is to be listed on the Moor Park website (www.moorpark1958.co.uk), together with comments made by the MP1958 planning team. Where the MP58 Planning Team entry is blank, this is because the proposal has not yet been reviewed. Full details of an application can be viewed on the core address of TRDC’s website (www.threerivers.gov.uk) which takes you to the home page, and then you need to click on to ‘Planning Online’ which directs you to https://www3.threerivers.gov.uk/online-applications
Residents who wish to search or comment either have to REGISTER if it is their first occasion for a visit, or LOGIN if they have previously visited and registered. Moor Park (1958) Ltd strongly encourages residents to view planning applications that have relevance to their own property or if they feel they wish to comment on any property development that causes them concern. In any communication, we urge residents to inform TRDC of their opinion of inappropriate developments so that this Company is not a solitary voice in commenting on planning applications.
In communicating with TRDC, it is essential to quote the TRDC planning application reference number and to note the closing date for any communication. You will also be asked to state the site address and your own address. Residents who offer their comments need to know that statements placed on the TRDC planning portal are in the public domain.
Comments from Moor Park residents should be sent only to TRDC and not to the Moor Park (1958) Ltd office.
Property Address | Application Number | Comments Deadline | Application Details | |
41 Astons Road |
24/0221/FUL |
07/03/24 |
Demolition of existing conservatory, garage and front porch; construction of two storey rear extension and first floor front extension with lower ground floor level, raised terrace and front portico; loft conversion including rear dormer windows, rear gables with rooflights |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
|
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 10/04/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
23 Russell Road |
24/0171/FUL |
26/02/24 |
Construction of first floor rear extension with rear juliet balconies; loft conversion including rear dormers with windows and rear rooflights |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
|
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 01/04/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
8 Heathside Road |
24/0070/RSP |
12/02/24 |
Part Retrospective: Erection of pergola structure in the rear patio |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
The Directors of Moor Park (1958) Limited have no objection to the proposed development. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 15/03/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
16 Pembroke Road |
24/0069/RSP |
12/02/24 |
Retrospective: Installation of rooflights to each side elevation |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
Previous application allowed for the rear of the property but specifically excluded rooflights in either side. This is against the MPCAA. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 15/03/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
Merchant Taylors School |
23/2122/FUL |
08/02/24 |
Installation of external artificial grass hockey pitch and warm up area with perimeter ball-stop fencing, ball stop netting, flood lighting system, dugouts and associated hardstanding |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
No objections subject to the LPA imposing the appropriate conditions re ecology and drainage. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 14/02/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
23 Wolsey Road |
24/0031/FUL |
06/02/24 |
Loft conversion including rear dormer windows and side rooflight; removal of chimney, and replacement of rooftiles |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
Plans need correcting to show the existing position. Proposed dormers to the rear are acceptable but objection to rooflight in the flank elevation as detrimental to the streetscene and appearance. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 11/03/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
29 Russell Road |
23/2134/FUL |
14/01/24 |
Construction of single storey side to rear extension and conversion of garage into habitable accommodation; provision of new window to side elevation |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
Pre 58 Property. Application, plans, and tree plan do not correspond and the PREAPP advice from TRDC has not been actioned. Questions re first floor side window and rooflight. Conflicts of documents need to be clarified first. Frontage rules of MPCAA not complied with. Flat roof on side extension not acceptable. As the PREAPP advice has not been complied with we request REFUSAL. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
PENDING |
TBA 08/02/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
3A The Dell |
23/2093/FUL |
05/01/24 |
Replacement of existing windows with alterations to rear fenestration |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
No objections. Not considered the replacement of existing aluminium windows and sliding doors with double-glazed will have any detrimental effect as too the change of sliding doors with a window. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
APPROVED |
19/01/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
42 Sandy Lodge Road |
23/2099/FUL |
04/01/24 |
Internal alterations and alterations to fenestration including rear dormer extension and addition of new dormer window to the front elevation; provision of internal lift |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
Pre-58 property. STRONG OBJECTIONS and seek refusal as the grounds for previous refusal in March have not been dealt with. Drawings are inaccurate as shown on attachment and the cluttered appearance would have substantial detrimental impact on MPCAA |
|||
TRDC Decision |
REFUSED |
31/01/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
65 Wolsey Road |
23/2075/FUL |
05/01/24 |
Replacement of existing windows |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
MP58 support this now that the necessary information has been provided. Existing windows are beyond repair and proposal does not detrimentally affect the MPCAA. Recent cases that TRDC have allowed with much greater detrimental impact would make any objection here hypocritical. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
APPROVED |
01/02/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
2 Nevil Close |
23/2020/FUL |
28/12/23 |
Replacement of windows and doors |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
Considering the character of the 1990 build the use of non-latticed glass would not be detrimental. MP58 has no objections. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
APPROVED |
26/01/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
18 North Approach |
23/1962/FUL |
28/12/23 |
Construction of single storey rear extension and associated patio extension, conversion of garage into habitable accommodation; loft conversion including rear dormer windows; provision ramped front access; removal of chimney to rear roof, replacement of doors and windows with associated internal alterations |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
The Directors of Moor Park (1958) Limited do not have any objections to the principles proposed in the development but consider that to avoid any confusion at a later date with respect to plans, the correct orientation ought to be shown on the various drawings. 18 North Approach fronts onto North Approach (which as the name implies runs in a north-south line) on the western side. However, the front elevation of the property is described as the north elevation, the rear elevation as the south elevation and the two flank elevations, one of which principally faces north and the other which principally faces south, are referred to as the east and west elevation |
|||
TRDC Decision |
REFUSED |
29/01/24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Address |
Application Number |
Comments Deadline |
Application Details |
|
56 South Approach |
23/1923/FUL |
18/12/23 |
Extension to existing driveway |
|
MP58 assessment comments |
The removal of the existing pinch-point on one side is sensible and does not extend past the existing drive width. Only a small area of grass removal and no trees or shrubs affected. MP58 has no objections. |
|||
TRDC Decision |
APPROVED |
12/01/24 |
|
|